Essay
The topic is " Is Edwards Snowden a whistle blower, a criminal, or both?" My answer is "Edward Snowden is both" He is a whistle blower and a criminal.
I admit that Edward Snowden is a criminal. Edward Snowden leaked lots of documents that contained many secrets of gorvernment. For example, Edward Snowden leaked a document that said the Obama Administration enabled the National Security Agency to collect caller information. He leaked government's screts. So he was a criminal. But, as a result, many Americans could realize that the privacy of them were exposed. Many Americans called the domestic spying an unnecessary invasion of privacy. Because he helped many Americans protect their privacy. I think Edward Snowden deserves to be called a whistle bloser. We can see another example. Edward Snowden leaked another document that regarded Europeans as a "location target." He should be called a criminal because he exposed government's screts. Thanks to Edward Snowden, however, Europeans could notice about the document. So he was a criminal and a whistleblower. All documents Edward Snowden leaked were about governments' screts. The all documents were helpful for many people. Briefly, Edward Snowden was a criminal because Edward Snowden leaked lots of information about the telephone calls without any permission. Thanks to it, many people's privacy were leaked. And some people started abusing the document. But he also should be regarded as a whistleblower. Some people started abusing but the other people could find a way to protect their privacy themselves.
I read 3 articles about Edward Snowden. One article was about the documents he leaked. Another document was about that Edward Snowden was a whistleblower. The other document was about that Edward Snowden was a criminal. He made a crime, but he also helped may people to realize about the documents which governments treated secretly. That's why I though "Edward Snowden is a criminal and a whistleblower."
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기